microsoft remote desktop mac alternative

'Microsoft Desktop Services is stable but it takes up a lot of resources in the CPU.

TeamViewer’s cost and security concerns make it less attractive for many users. Microsoft Remote Desktop is a complete solution that is already a part of every Microsoft ecosystem. Service and Support: For the most part, users of both solutions are satisfied with the service and support.Ĭomparison Results: Microsoft Remote Desktop Services slightly nudges out TeamViewer in this comparison.Many feel the corporate licensing and pricing can be expensive. TeamViewer has a free trial version available with limited features. Pricing: Microsoft Remote Desktop Services comes at no cost as part of Microsoft Windows outside of Microsoft, licensing can be costly.Users would like to see improved security and more support for other operating systems. Users find it is stable, works great remotely, and even performs well with very low bandwidth. TeamViewer makes it easy for administrators to login, add simple connections, or lock the remote systems. Many users feel on-site multi-fact authorization and better integrations with other operating systems is needed. The solution offers command line interface (CLI) capabilities, which make it easy to manage IDs, passwords, credentials, and more. Features: Microsoft Remote Desktop users feel the solution is stable, reliable, and scales easily.Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions tell us they are easy and straightforward to deploy.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Microsoft Remote Desktop Services and TeamViewer based on our users’ reviews in four categories.

Microsoft remote desktop mac alternative